An Indian court has mandated an Amazon unit to pay $39 million for violating the "Beverly Hills Polo Club" trademark. This decision follows the sale of garments with similar branding on

The case was initiated by Lifestyle Equities, which owns the "Beverly Hills Polo Club" horse trademark. They claimed that Amazon's Indian website listed apparel featuring a similar logo at much lower prices. The Delhi High Court noted that the logos were nearly indistinguishable, highlighting this in its detailed 85-page order, which included images comparing the T-shirts.
Trademark Infringement and Legal Proceedings
The infringing brand was associated with Amazon Technologies and was available on Amazon India's site. Despite these findings, Amazon has denied any wrongdoing. Representatives from both the U.S. and India divisions of Amazon did not respond to requests for comments regarding the court's decision.
Amazon has been involved in multiple litigations concerning this issue across various jurisdictions, including the UK. The Indian court issued a "permanent injunction," acknowledging Amazon's awareness of Lifestyle Equities' exclusive rights to the BHPC mark and logo.
Implications of the Court's Decision
Aditya Gupta, a partner at Ira Law in India, remarked, "This is likely the highest damages sum awarded in a trademark infringement suit in India ... It now remains to be seen how this Indian judgment is enforced by the U.S. courts." This statement underscores the potential challenges in enforcing such judgments internationally.
In 2019, Lifestyle Equities accused Amazon of similar infringements in London. Subsequently, last year, Amazon lost an appeal against a ruling that it had violated UK trademarks by targeting British consumers through its U.S. website.
Amazon's Previous Allegations
A Reuters investigation in 2021 uncovered that Amazon had engaged in creating knockoffs and manipulating search results to promote its private brands within India. This investigation was based on thousands of internal documents from Amazon.
The outcome of this case could influence future trademark infringement cases involving international companies operating within India. The enforcement of such rulings across borders remains a complex issue that will require careful navigation by all parties involved.
More From GoodReturns

Stock Market Holidays: BSE, NSE To Be Closed For 3 Days From March 30-April 5; Mahavir Jayanti To Good Friday

Russia to Halt Gasoline Exports from April 1 for Four Months to Stabilise Domestic Fuel Prices

New PAN Card Rules From April 1, 2026: How To Apply For New PAN Card Via Protean, E-Filing Portal?

LPG Gas Cylinder Prices Hiked Again From April 1; 19 KG LPG Gets Costlier By Rs 218; 14.2 KG LPG Unchanged

Gold Rate in India Rises Over Rs 37,000/24K in Three Days; Will Jump in Gold Price Today Continue on 31 March?

Gas Cylinder Booking Rules: 5 Things To Know For Your 14.2Kg, 19KG, 5KG, 10KG LPG Booking In April 2026

Gold Rate Today Continues Rally, 24K Jumps Over Rs 35000 in 2 Days; 22K & 18K Gold, Silver Prices in Delhi

Bank Holiday In April 2026: Banks To Be Closed For 14 Days; Good Friday, Baisakhi To Akshaya Tritiya

Gold Price Today Declines After 3-Day Surge; Check Latest 22K, 24K, 18K Gold & Silver Rates in Delhi on 2April

Gold Price Today, April 3: 22K, 24K Rates Jump Across Tanishq, Malabar, Kalyan & Joyalukkas & IBJA

5 New Shares On One Soon: Anil Agarwal's Vedanta Demerger To Take Place in April, Says Report



Click it and Unblock the Notifications