Rajeev Chandrasekhar Counters Elon Musk's Criticism of EVMs in Public Exchange

In a recent exchange on X (formerly Twitter), former Union minister Rajeev Chandrasekhar engaged in a debate with Tesla CEO Elon Musk over the security of electronic voting machines (EVMs). Musk, who has voiced concerns about the potential for EVMs to be hacked, faced opposition from Chandrasekhar, who defended India's EVM technology as secure and foolproof.

Chandrasekhar vs Musk on EVM Security

Musk's initial post called for the elimination of electronic voting machines, citing a small but significant risk of hacking by humans or AI. This statement was supported by a shared post from Robert F. Kennedy Jr., which highlighted media reports on voting irregularities involving EVMs in Puerto Rico's primary elections. Chandrasekhar, the former minister of state for Electronics and IT, countered Musk's argument by labeling it a "huge sweeping generalisation" that undermines the capability to create secure digital hardware.

Chandrasekhar further differentiated between the EVMs used in the US and other countries, which are often connected to the internet, and India's EVMs, which are custom-designed, secure, and isolated from any network or media. He emphasized that Indian EVMs have no connectivity options like Bluetooth or WiFi and are equipped with factory-programmed controllers that cannot be reprogrammed, ensuring their security against unauthorized access.

The former Union minister confidently stated that electronic voting machines can be designed and built securely, as evidenced by India's experience. He even offered to run a tutorial for Musk, highlighting India's success in developing tamper-proof voting technology. Musk responded succinctly to Chandrasekhar's explanations with a brief remark: "Anything can be hacked."

This exchange underscores the ongoing global debate about the reliability and security of electronic voting systems. While concerns about their vulnerability persist, India's approach to EVM design and implementation serves as a case study in how to mitigate these risks effectively. The conversation between Chandrasekhar and Musk brings to light the importance of understanding the technical nuances behind electronic voting systems and the need for continuous dialogue on ensuring their integrity.

More From GoodReturns

Notifications
Settings
Clear Notifications
Notifications
Use the toggle to switch on notifications
  • Block for 8 hours
  • Block for 12 hours
  • Block for 24 hours
  • Don't block
Gender
Select your Gender
  • Male
  • Female
  • Others
Age
Select your Age Range
  • Under 18
  • 18 to 25
  • 26 to 35
  • 36 to 45
  • 45 to 55
  • 55+